Further to the entry yesterday, some pretty scary reading here from novelist Lawrence Britt via this site, who claims that as of January 2004, the United States fulfills all fourteen points of fascism. Also read the comment on my previous entry re the latest transgression by the federal government.. this rolling boulder seems to be gathering momentum.
The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
by Dr. Lawrence Britt
Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14-defining characteristics common to each:
- Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. - Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of 'need'. The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc. - Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc. - Supremacy of the Military
Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized. - Rampant Sexism
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution. - Controlled Mass Media
Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common. - Obsession with National Security
Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. - Religion and Government are Intertwined
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions. - Corporate Power is Protected
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. - Labor Power is Suppressed
Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. - Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked. - Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations. - Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. - Fraudulent Elections
Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
eep! wtf?
Heading headlong into Fascism? from John P. Hoke's Asylum on December 13, 2004 7:33 PM
Nereus over at Urban Scrawl directs us over to Dr. Lawrence Britt (notice Doctorates are never "Larry") who says that the United States met all of the 14 defining characteristics of Fascism in January 2004. While I do not believe we ... ..read more
14 Points. from Rook's Rant on December 15, 2004 11:19 PM
The question isn't how many of these apply, because that would require a long answer, but how many of these haven't happened yet in the US, because that would be the shorter answer. From Urban Scrawl: The 14 Defining Characteristics... ..read more
Armstrong Williams and the Media Whores from The Two Percent Company's Rants on January 8, 2005 1:51 PM
Armstrong Williams is, apparently, a well-known conservative television and radio commentator and columnist. That was news to us, but then he does seem to be just another conservative shill, and we tend to avoid such dubious sources of "news." As... ..read more

Larry Bush | February 15, 2005 7:56 AM | Reply
The scary part of all this is that those who are aware of what is going on are not flocking to the Libertarian Party in America.
Larry Bush
john crowley | February 18, 2005 10:56 PM | Reply
Just who is Lawrence Britt and why does he have any standing to comment on fascism? As far as I can determine this is a badly researched, wildly partisan diatribe without any significant relevance. If this were a senior thesis at any but the most extreme liberal campuses, it would receive a failing grade.
Nereus | February 19, 2005 7:44 AM | Reply
'Dr' Lawrence Britt is allegedly a political scientist. The article in question was originally written in the Free Inquiry Magazine (Volume 23, Number 2: Oct/Nov 2003), however the article is attributed to a Laurence W Britt (note the absense of the title Dr there) who appears to be a novelist.
Another article from Rochester's City Newspaper informs readers the Laurence Britt is a retired professional who used to work for Allied Chemical, Mobil, and Xerox Corp. His politics were clarified during his years studying business at Northwestern University in the early 1960s, although it does not specify if he gained a doctorate.
"I had a course in Situational Analysis," says Britt. "You would analyze facts and come to a solution for businesses. I applied the same methodology to determine what political philosophy was most appropriate. After a lot of reading and research, I came down on the progressive side."
Since retiring, Britt has written three novels, but it's that one short article from Free Inquiry Magazine that has gained him high visibility on the left. The article in the City Newspaper linked above also asks Britt to elaborate on the 14 points of fascism and makes an interesting read. From what I can ascertain, he is not actually a doctor, and not a political scientist either (at least not professionally). Interesting. I imagine the press somewhere along the line embellished the original story to make it more newsworthy by adding the Dr title and calling him a political scientist rather than a novelist; sounds more 'official' I guess...
I'll edit out the 'Dr' from my original entry. Thanks for the reality check John. :)
I also found this article titled "Eternal Fascism: Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt" written in 1995.. which bears remarkable similarity to Britts article written 9 years later, having the same number of points (14) even.. hmm.
Noteworthy:
15. A significant upsurge in the number of lists which enumerate the characteristics of fascism.
Interesting quote I happened across along the way though:
"Under the influence of politicians, masses of people tend to ascribe the responsibility of wars to those who wield power at any given time. In World War I it was the munitions industrialists; in World War II it was the psychopathic generals who were said to be guilty. This is passing the buck. The responsibility for wars falls solely upon the shoulders of these masses of people, for they have all the necessary means to avert war in their own hands. In part by their apathy, in part by their passivity, and in part actively, these same masses of people make possible the catastrophes under which they themselves suffer more than anyone else. To stress this guilt on the part of the masses of people, to hold them solely responsible, means to take them seriously. On the other hand, to commiserate the masses of people as victims, means to treat them as small, helpless children. The former is the attitude held by the genuine freedom-fighters; the latter is the attitude held by the power-thirsty politicians."...
Reich, Wilhelm, "The Mass Psychology of Fascism". (Farrar, Straux & Giroux; New York; 1980).
spencer | May 9, 2005 9:01 AM | Reply
The scary part of all this is that those who are aware of what is going on are not flocking to the Libertarian Party in America.
The Libertarian Party? Please. Throwing the weak to the wolves is not the answer.